Beta · Free to use
See how information
is constructed
Dissekt does not tell you what is true or false. It shows you how content is built — what techniques are used, what evidence exists, what context is missing, and how different sources frame the same story.
Paste any article, URL, or social post — and get a transparency report in seconds.
0.52
Sample: "PM defends budget amid opposition criticism"
3 techniques · 2 fact-checks · Moderate transparency
Clarity score 0.52 · Moderate— higher means more transparently constructed, not "more true."
Construction
how it is built
0.64
Verification
how supported
0.38
Intent
what it wants
0.58
loaded languagecherry pickingappeal to authority2 fact-checks found
The problem with information today
You cannot tell how a story was constructed just by reading it.
🎭
Same event, different stories
Two outlets cover the same event — one says "crisis," the other says "transition." Both use facts. Neither is lying. But the framing changes everything.
🔇
What's missing matters most
The most powerful manipulation is not what is said — it is what is left out. Missing context, omitted counter-arguments, selective data.
🧠
You can't unsee patterns
Once you see how loaded language, emotional escalation, and false equivalence work, you read everything differently. That is the point.
How Dissekt works
Paste a URL, text, or social media post. Get a full transparency report in seconds.
1
Paste anything
News article, social media post, YouTube video, Reddit thread, WhatsApp forward — or just raw text.
2
Multiple engines analyze
Technique detection, fact-checker cross-references, source credibility, toxicity, political context — all in parallel.
3
See the construction
Three-dimensional score: how it is built (Construction), how verified it is (Verification), and what it wants you to do (Intent).
Three questions, one score
Every analysis answers three fundamentally different questions.
🏗️
Construction
How is it built?
• Rhetoric — severity-weighted techniques
• Argumentation — logical structure
• Completeness — who, what, when, sources, counter-view
✅
Verification
How verified is it?
• Evidence — fact-checker consensus
• Source — MBFC credibility
• Diversity — independent sources
• Temporal — consistency over time
🎯
Intent
What does it want me to do?
• Tone — context-aware toxicity
• Manipulation — urgency, escalation
• Narrative — framing direction
Clarity = (Construction × Verification × Intent) ^ 1/3 · Scale: 0.0 → 1.0
Scores reflect the evidence available — thin inputs are flagged as limited signal, not guessed.
Scores reflect the evidence available — thin inputs are flagged as limited signal, not guessed.
6 analysis engines
Every scan runs through 6 specialized engines in parallel.
🔦Beacon
Orchestrator — parallel pipeline
🔺Prism
20 manipulation techniques
🔎Lens
Fact-checker cross-references
🌈Spectrum
Toxicity + credibility + sentiment
💠Claims
Claim extraction + typing
🧭Meridian
68 politicians, 4 countries
Analyze anything from anywhere
Paste a URL from any platform. Auto-detects and extracts the full content.
🌐
News sites
🟠
Reddit
🎥
YouTube
🦋
Bluesky
🐘
Mastodon
📰
Substack
Tools for seeing clearly
📊Dashboard
Your scan history, reading profile, and API keys in one place
📒Ledger
Decision journal — log Trust / Unsure / Reject on what you read
🪞Reflect
Your reading profile — how you tend to judge what you read
💠Facet
Plain-language summary atop every report — what it is, what it says, the key finding
🔑API access
Scan programmatically with your own API key
6
Engines
20
Techniques
100+
Fact-check network
231
Media rated
68
Politicians
Built on research, not opinions
Our scoring metrics draw on peer-reviewed research.
Our scoring metrics draw on peer-reviewed research in propaganda detection, media-source credibility, argumentation quality, and toxicity. See the full references →
For everyone who reads
📰
Journalists
See how a story is framed, cross-check claims against existing fact-checks, and log your trust decisions.
🎓
Researchers
Systematic framing analysis, source-credibility data, and API access.
👨🏫
Educators
Show students how framing works and build media literacy.
📱
Everyone
Check that forward before sharing. See if a claim was fact-checked. Know your own bias.
Start free. Go deeper with an account.
🔐 Account
Free — sign up with email
25 brief / day
10 detailed / day
All features + API + Dashboard
Sign upor sign in10 detailed / day
All features + API + Dashboard
Ready to see clearly?
Paste any article, claim, or URL.
Analyze something now✓ Free to start✓ Research-backed